A lawyer has formally petitioned authorities to exempt members of the legal profession from e-challan fines, raising concerns about the financial and professional impact of automated traffic penalties on lawyers. The petition argues that many legal professionals operate under financial constraints, especially younger lawyers or those running small practices, and that they are generally law-abiding citizens who respect traffic regulations. By imposing fines through e-challans, the system may unintentionally burden those who are dedicated to upholding the law, creating financial stress without addressing deliberate wrongdoing.
The petition highlights that lawyers play a critical role in the justice system, representing clients, maintaining court schedules, and contributing to the administration of justice. Excessive or automatic fines could affect their ability to perform these duties effectively. It also points out that e-challan systems, while designed to improve efficiency and reduce manual enforcement, may not differentiate between minor or accidental infractions and habitual offenders, potentially penalizing professionals disproportionately.
This appeal calls for authorities to consider a tailored approach for the legal community, suggesting exemptions or alternative measures that recognize the unique responsibilities and financial realities of lawyers. Supporters argue that such a policy would not only ease the financial burden on lawyers but also demonstrate respect for those who contribute significantly to the functioning of the justice system.
The move has sparked discussions within the legal community about the broader implications of digital fines and the need for regulatory frameworks that balance efficiency with fairness, particularly for professionals whose work serves the public interest. By seeking special consideration, the petition aims to ensure that lawyers can continue to focus on their legal duties without being unduly penalized for minor, unintentional infractions.
